View Full Version : albino stonei - described yet?


silence882
May 2nd, 2006, 11:43 PM
Anyone know if the albino form of Paph. stonei has been officially described?

Also, shouldn't exact quotes in books be noted as such, even if the book being quoted is by the same author? I ask this because of a passage concerning Paph. lynniae in Cribb's 1998 monograph. Here is the quote:

"He compared it with P. lowii but it differs in having glabrous sepals, ovary, pedicel, bracts, peduncle and rachis, a keeled dorsal sepal and two-keeled synsepal, both lightly spotted in their basal halves, and a staminode with three equal apical teeth and a long basal umbo. It may be that its relationship to P. lowii is similar to that between P. parishii and P. dianthum in mainland South-east Asia, but its isolated occurrence in cultication and lack of exact provenance suggests that it is more likely a variation of P. lowii, which is a widespread species in Borneo.... Certainly, more needs to be known about its distribution and natural variation."

This passage is exactly the same as in his 1997 books, Slipper Orchids of Borneo. Shouldn't this be explicitly noted?

--Stephen

Olaf
May 8th, 2006, 05:03 PM
Dear Stephen,
the albino of Paph. stonei is not described officially. The plant was shown only with clonal name in a Taiwanese journal.
It would be described, when it woul be possible to get a typespecimen fo the herbarium. To describe it only on the base of a picture is not an usual and acceptable way

Best greetings

Olaf

silence882
May 8th, 2006, 06:02 PM
Olaf,

Thanks very much for the info. The cultivar 'Formosa' was awarded a CHM/TPS seven years ago, so I'm surprised that no one has described it yet.

--Stephen